Is Democratic Socialism Right For America?

But capitalism has also defined Americans as workers and consumers, only working to consume the next iphone or second home. Albeit, these things are making life better for most Americans, but has capitalism and limited government shaded our view from those left behind?

However, there’s a phrase that sums up much of what the Democratic Socialist platform offers that many throughout history have learned the hard way, “If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.”

As the House of Representatives changes parties, Democrats will be pressured by influencers like Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez to enact such policies — the foremost being Medicare for All.

You’ve heard the program would be expensive. True, it would cost about $32 trillion over 10 years. In order to pay for such a program, Americans’ tax rates would likely be doubled. But there are many touting Medicare for All who do not care what the program would cost. Instead, they see health insurance as a right, despite the fiscal damage it would do to America and her citizens.

So if we trade fiscal health for health insurance, what kind of care will Americans receive?

There is no denying that America’s health care system is in trouble. But as a country that has excelled in innovation, we should not settle for a government managed system that will provide middling care for all at the expense of high quality care for most.

Sanders and his followers also want to make drastic changes to the labor market, proposing a federal jobs guarantee. A job for everyone, provided by the federal government, promoting dignity and a decent standard of living — that’s what they’re saying anyway.

While many would point to the costs of employing the entire country, in reality, it wouldn’t cost as much as sceptics would think, however, it would change the labor force dramatically for the worse. “According to the Economic Policy Institute, 39% of the workforce, some 54 million people, now earn $15 an hour or less. All would have an incentive to quit and join the federal program. Of course, most wouldn’t because their employers would, grudgingly, raise pay to keep them, then pass the cost on to customers, a de facto inflation tax,” says Greg Ip.

Besides having a job that allows you to provide for your family, the other piece of the American dream for many years was a college education, and with free college tuition, everyone can achieve that dream, right?

The argument goes; if students that can’t afford college, could afford college, they would go, succeed, and be productive members of society. Thanks to Higher Education Act of 1965, more students are enrolled in college than ever before and more low-income students have greater opportunities to attend college. While student debt rightfully garners a lot of attention, is mass college enrollment the best use of our resources?

The argument for college for everyone is rooted in a vision for a “great society” more than it is in economics or freedom. The fact is simply, not everyone wants, or needs a college degree. Innovation outside the traditional college structure would be a more productive and more efficient alternative for young Americans.

So many politicians and Americans have been drawn to bold federal solutions without considering the price tag in dollars and freedom.

One thing that all of these proposals have in common is they are wildly expensive. Though it would seem that no party really cares about the debt or the cost of any government program anymore, someday, future generations will. Long term deficits could lead to economic disasters if buyers of U.S. debt no longer trust the ability of the U.S. government to pay them back. Even absent an economic crisis, there are still massive risks of inflation or high interest rates that will suppress economic opportunities and send more tax dollars to pay off bonds than go to budget items like as defense, research, or infrastructure.

Because governments can tax and print money to cover those debts, many believe that the government is immune to the same detriments associated with personal debts. A tried and true excuse by Congress to spend more or tax less. They are right that no one can foreclose on the federal government, but there are consequences when a government borrows more than it can afford. And those will primarily fall on incoming generations.

It’s tough to be a wet blanket and say no to programs that, on the surface, sound like they will help our most vulnerable and create a better life for the average American. However, there’s no such thing as a free lunch, and the cost will ultimately catch up to Americans, whether that be generations alive today or tomorrow. As they say, what goes around comes around.

Ronald Reagan famously said in his farewell speech, “Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn’t pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children’s children what it was once like in the United States where men were free.” America is too important to so many. Losing sight of how we got here would be a dire mistake.

Related posts:

Emprendedores cubanos lanzaron la plataforma Qvapay, que permite a los ciudadanos de ese país realizar pagos con criptomonedas dentro y fuera de la Isla. Además del uso de criptomonedas, la nueva…

MTSU has turned itself in a breeding ground for academic stimulation as well as a cesspool of creativity and imagination amongst the students. Thus, it is no surprise the student body has created…

Reese Buhr is a homophobe, yet he tried to enter a gay club. He was denied entry because he may have used homophobic slurs. Did he spew homophobic bigotry while waiting in line for the club that…